Sample report

Brand Intelligence Report

Digital Marketing Agency · Redacted sample · Prepared by Miranda

Sample · shared with prospects

Objective & method

Measure the distance between how the agency presents itself and how the market actually reads it.

The report reads the subject across its owned channels (website, LinkedIn, case studies) and the earned signal that surrounds them: client review platforms, trade press, industry awards and employee review platforms. It then benchmarks the same footprint against four direct competitors to locate the opportunities the agency can move measurably in one quarter.

11
sources scraped
200+
Glassdoor reviews
12 mo
rolling window
Company website LinkedIn Glassdoor (live) Trustpilot (live) Clutch FeaturedCustomers Marketing trade press Industry awards Employer-brand certifications

The report ends on a prioritized action plan with baselines measurable at the next audit.

Why monitor online signals

For an agency, public reputation is a two-way pipeline. It shapes who agrees to work for you and who agrees to hire you. Talent reviews and client reviews are the two loudest proxies of lived experience, and they move in parallel rather than in sequence.

86%
of job seekers read company ratings
and reviews before applying
92%
of B2B buyers are more likely to buy
after reading a trusted review
×1.05–1.09
revenue lift per one-star
rating improvement

In brief

The short version of the next fifteen slides.

Strong +
industry & new business
Named Independent Performance Agency of the Year in a major trade award (2025). Won a DTC consumer-brand Global Media AOR account in a 4-stage pitch vs 6 competitors. Prior Performance Agency of the Year wins in 2022.
Positive, hidden
client voice where visible
5 named testimonials visible on FeaturedCustomers, 20+ locked behind a paywall. A flagship case carries +135% conversions and 4.4x search-term coverage, but only one click deep.
0 & 0
public review platforms
0 reviews on the Clutch main profile vs closest comparator at 430+ reviews, 4.9 / 5. Trustpilot unclaimed, 0 reviews. Glassdoor sub-3.0 on 200+ reviews is a supporting risk signal, not the headline.

The agency wins the pitch and wins the award. It does not yet publish the evidence where mid-market buyers vet an agency.

Brand identity

What the agency says about itself, its model, and its pricing

Declared positioning, ownership, service architecture and rate card pulled from owned channels and industry press.

Official positioning

What the brand claims: its promise and its four pillars.

[redacted tagline — performance + intelligence positioning]

Company website, 2025 rebrand

Independent at scale

Mid-size core staff plus a large specialist freelance network covering 100+ markets. A PE firm took a majority stake in late 2024; founders retained a minority position.

Proprietary OS

A proprietary operating layer wrapping four modules. Positioned on owned channels as the core differentiator, not a back-office tool.

Agentic AI layer

Agentic AI layer launched in late 2025. Anchors a claim of being “the most agentic independent media agency,” a space several direct competitors are actively contesting.

Global roster

5 offices across UK, US and MENA. Named clients span audio, CPG, retail, consumer electronics, apparel, DTC consumer goods and gaming.

Digital presence & reactivity

Owned audience is dense and recent. The pipeline to respond to public client signal is missing.

~40k
LinkedIn followers
~730
employees listed
55:1
follower-to-employee
1 / 5
brand response score
Owned reach is strong

LinkedIn carries the primary voice, supported by X, Instagram and an owned Resources hub. Publication cadence is dense around award wins, the 2025 rebrand and the agentic-AI launch. The top-of-funnel story is well told on the agency’s own surfaces.

Review channels are empty

Trustpilot profile sits unclaimed with 0 reviews and a stale legacy address. The main Clutch profile shows 0 active reviews. No process is running to solicit, monitor or respond to public client reviews: the client signal is not negative, it is absent.

Services & pricing

Premium indie rate card, declared openly. Quantified proof exists but is buried one click deep.

Hourly rate
$150–199
per hour (Clutch)
Minimum project
$10,000
declared floor
Headcount band
501–1,000
staff (LinkedIn)
Case studies
8 / 0
grid cards / with numbers
The tension at the rate card

Engagement modes span agency of record, in-housing support, channel-specific performance and full-funnel media with creative. The rate card and minimum project size read premium indie. Eight case studies show on the /work grid with zero numbers, yet the sub-pages carry them: one flagship case publishes +135% conversions at target CPA, 4.4x unique search terms, 1000% non-brand PPC. The closest comparator surfaces CPC deltas on every grid card. The agency has the evidence; the portfolio architecture does not reveal it.

What the market actually says

Industry is loud, clients vouch privately, talent sits apart

Two readings, one agency

Experts rate the agency among the best indie shops. Clients who work with it speak well of it. The gap is that client voice is private, not public.

Expert & industry perception
Strong +
loud and discoverable
  • Independent Performance Agency of the Year (trade body, 2025)
  • Performance Agency of the Year wins UK & US (2022)
  • Award judges cited “great numbers for client retention and wins”
  • Net-positive coverage across the major marketing trade titles
Client perception
Positive, private
real signal, not on public platforms
  • DTC Global Media AOR win, recent, beat 6 competing agencies
  • FeaturedCustomers: 5 named testimonials visible, 20+ locked
  • Flagship case: +135% conversions, 4.4x search terms
  • Clutch main 0 reviews · Trustpilot unclaimed

Talent signal (Glassdoor sub-3.0 on 200+ reviews) is real but sits in a third register, treated as a supporting risk in the Gaps section.

Voice of the market

Named clients cite a global-local operating model and outcomes. Talent voice aims at leadership.

Client voice (FeaturedCustomers)
[Client verbatim redacted — praises coverage of 100+ local markets through a single digital partner.] Global Digital Marketing Director, multi-market services client · Global-local model
[Client verbatim redacted — names a specific product launch that broke a day-one category record.] Digital Marketing Manager, gaming client · Named outcome
[Client verbatim redacted — praises the team’s talent and results focus.] Head of Marketing, media client · Passion & team
Talent voice (Glassdoor, supporting)
[Review paraphrased — leadership culture called out as toxic across multiple recent reviews.] Glassdoor, 1.0 / 5, recent · Leadership trust
[Review paraphrased — salaries described as below comparable agencies, limited progression, perceived cliques.] Glassdoor, Manager-level, HQ market · Pay & progression
[Review paraphrased — peers and colleagues described positively even inside negative reviews.] Glassdoor, 1.0 / 5, recent · Peers saved in a 1-star

And against the others?

Five agencies sitting on the same pitch shortlist. On talent rating and public client proof, the subject is fourth of five.

Agency Glassdoor GD volume Clutch Positioning
Subject agency <3.0 200+ 0 Indie, PE-backed, AI-native rebrand
Competitor A 3.2 550+ fragmented Holdco-owned, big-tech heritage
Competitor B 3.4 350+ 4.9 / 430+ PE-backed, performance-science positioning
Competitor C 2.7 50+ n/a Independent, multi-office, performance-driven
Competitor D 3.3 1,100+ N/A holdco Holdco-owned, global expert bench
Digital presence index (panel max = 100)
Competitor D
89.8
holdco scale
Competitor A
81.0
holdco reach
Competitor B
62.6
Clutch 4.9 / 430+
Subject agency
29.5
4th of 5
Competitor C
21.8
sub-scale

Where signal and story diverge

Three gaps. Six actions.

Gaps & blind spots

Three gaps between the brand narrative and the market’s reading. Two are client-facing. One is a supporting risk on the talent side.

Blind spot · Client voice exists; buyers cannot see it

What the agency has: recent AOR win vs 6 competing agencies, 40+ claimed FeaturedCustomers references, a flagship case at +135% conversions. What a Google-search buyer sees: Clutch 0 reviews vs closest comparator at 430+ reviews, 4.9; Trustpilot unclaimed. Supply is real; routing to public platforms is missing.

Blind spot · Quantified outcomes buried below the portfolio grid

The grid shows: 8 case studies with qualitative framing only. The sub-pages carry numbers: a flagship case publishes four metrics; the same grid card shows none. Award judges cited “great numbers for client retention and wins.” The closest comparator publishes CPC deltas on every card. The friction is editorial.

Promise vs reality · Talent brand (supporting risk)

The brand says: people-first, multiple employer-brand awards and certifications over recent years. The talent signal: sub-3.0 on 200+ Glassdoor reviews, Senior Mgmt under 2.6, recent 1-stars citing leadership culture. Buyers increasingly read employer reputation as a delivery-risk proxy.

Action plan

Six actions ordered by impact. Each cites its finding and a measurable baseline.

# Action Finding KPI / baseline Effort
1 Build Clutch presence (20 verified reviews Q2-Q3) Clutch main 0 reviews vs closest comparator 430+ at 4.9 / 5. FeaturedCustomers claims 40+ client references; supply exists. Clutch review count · Baseline 0 Med
2 Lift quantified outcomes onto the /work portfolio grid Flagship sub-page: +135% conv, 4.4x search terms. Zero metrics on any of the 8 grid cards. Cards with a numerical outcome · Baseline 0 / 8 Med
3 Claim Trustpilot profile, decide activate vs redirect Profile unclaimed, 0 reviews, stale legacy address still shown. Profile claimed + review count · Baseline 0 Low
4 Bridge recent AOR and high-profile brand wins into the published narrative Recent AOR win (vs 6 agencies) plus 3 high-profile brand wins visible in press, absent from /work. New-business case studies published · Baseline 0 / 4 Med
5 Close the talent promise-vs-reality gap publicly Senior Mgmt under 2.6 / 5, CEO approval below 50%, multiple recent 1-stars. Delivery-risk proxy for buyers. Glassdoor Senior Mgmt · Baseline < 2.6 / 5 Med
6 Prove the proprietary OS and agentic-AI story with 2-3 co-bylined client case studies Launched in late 2025. Cited in a recent AOR pitch; 0 post-engagement testimonials name it yet. Named OS case studies · Baseline 0 Med

Synthesis

The agency wins the pitch and wins the award. It does not yet publish the evidence where buyers vet agencies.

The 2025-26 run is objectively good: a major Independent Performance Agency of the Year win, a DTC Global Media AOR chosen against 6 competitors, five named client testimonials on FeaturedCustomers, quantified flagship case results at +135% conversions. The unfinished part is public discoverability. Clutch main sits at 0 while the closest comparator runs 430+ at 4.9, Trustpilot is unclaimed, and the portfolio grid hides the numbers the sub-pages already carry. The Glassdoor signal is a supporting risk worth addressing, not the story. The six actions converge on one axis: make the client evidence visible on the surfaces buyers already use.

6
prioritized actions
1
low effort
5
medium or higher
T+3
months to re-audit

Next review recommended: July 2026

Sample report

Brand Intelligence Report

Prepared by Miranda · April 2026 · [email protected]

Redacted sample · shared with permission